Custom finished furniture style oral agreement does not meet the court against the owners.

Wang <p> six months ago from a custom-made mahogany furniture, a furniture factory, and the style of the furniture contract. .But the furniture was finished, Ms. Wang was not in the factory relative to the style of production, also sued the manufacturers, requiring double the return of the deposit. .</ P> <p> 2009 year, Ms. Wang in a set of custom-made mahogany furniture, rosewood furniture factory, paid a deposit of 2,500 yuan, Wang also verbally described in detail with the manufacturers of furniture, style, pattern requirements. .</ P> <p> February of this year, Ms. Wang to the factory on time delivery, but having watched the production of furniture manufacturers, I feel very satisfied, patterns and was far from their own requirements, so, Ms. Wang refused to take delivery. .So Ms. Wang sued manufacturers also require manufacturers to double their deposit returned 5,000. .</ P> <p> but manufacturers say that, they are completely in accordance with the intention of making furniture, Ms. Wang is Wang reason for return, returned to manufacturers to bring no small economic loss. .Wang custom-made furniture worth nearly 2 million breach of contract because Ms. Wang, who must deal with this low-cost furniture. .</ P> <p> the end, Ms. Wang's request did not receive support for the Court. .Judge held that, when Ms. Wang agreed and furniture factory furniture styles, patterns belong to an oral agreement, no verification. .Therefore, both sides have presented no sufficient evidence that the other party breach of contract, Ms. Wang requires double the return of the deposit furniture factory can not support the request of the court. .Contract is not fulfilled, both losses. .So, this year in April, the court returned Wang furniture factory half of the deposit, which is 1250 yuan. .</ P ><!-- Adsunion AD Code Begin Here. AD Place: pl-84-fubiao -> <P> <P> <! - Adsunion AD Code End Here. AD Place: pl-84-fubiao- .->.