Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Plagued the development of quality standards for the furniture industry caused the industry to revise the earthquake.
<p> recent National Conference on the Standardization of furniture held in Shanghai, attended the National Standardization Committee, vice chairman of furniture, Shanghai Quality Supervision, Inspection and Technical Research Institute Jifei introduced, according to the initial establishment of the furniture of the standard system, the Secretariat will be established .11 sub-standard furniture Committee (SC), responsible for general management infrastructure, furniture and product safety, resource saving and comprehensive utilization of furniture systems category. .At present, China's furniture industry has been significantly accelerated standardization system, the standard will speed up our pace with the international furniture industry to enhance the international status of China's furniture standards, improve the quality of furniture products and technology. .</ P ><!-- Adsunion AD Code Begin Here. AD Place: pl-84-fubiao -> <P> <P> <! - Adsunion AD Code End Here. AD Place: pl-84-fubiao- .-> <p> is too low export barriers difficult to crack </ p> <p> reporter learned that, as of July 2010 survey results, the furniture-related standards for over a hundred items, including furniture by the National Standardization Technical .centralized management of the Commission a total of 80 furniture standards, including 42 national standards, industry standard 38. .Nevertheless, it does not cover all categories of furniture production, furniture in recent years with new products, new processes, new materials are constantly emerging, standards simply could not keep up with the rapid development of the industry, and that the Chinese Furniture Association .Chairman Jia Qingwen pointed out: "Over the last 30 years of furniture industry is developing rapidly, but there are still standardized lag problems which restrict the furniture industry, technological progress and industrial development, resulting in the furniture market, lack of support for consolidation of technical regulations. .China's exports of wooden furniture and some upholstered furniture and other products many times encountered the European Union, the United States and other developed countries and regions, technical barriers to trade. ."</ P> <p> recalled the many times this year, anti-dumping and international furniture trade disputes, a large number of substandard products into the domestic to the international market has become a non-conforming product, which also reflects the lag of industry standards. .Experts have pointed out, however, the standardization of China's furniture industry has been lagging behind, the current standard in the existing Part 80 standard age there too long and technology lagged behind the international standards adopted standard rates not high, deputy director of national standards has the right to stone Paul .said: "The current international trade, increasing the role of technical barriers, in fact, exports to China by the impact of technical barriers is greater than the anti-dumping, China joined the WTO, trade barriers are reduced, but the United States and Europe .and use technology, the standard barrier up card products exported by China, therefore, enhance the standard work on enhancing our product quality, to break barriers to international technology of great significance. ."</ P> <p> standard fog behind the business forward </ p> <p> now plagued by quality problems at home is the source of most enterprises, small-scale, low-skilled production, management practices coupled with product standards .lack, making the industry very difficult to manage, and even some "black heart" manufacturers use inferior raw materials, copied from another product, shoddy, shoddy. .Even in large companies, there are some "choreographed" phenomenon, the lack of standardized product quality, quite a mixed bag. .According to the relevant figure, our country among the existing standards of furniture, about 1995 years ago, that the standard criteria for 75%. .The standards issued after 1995, only 25%. .Obviously, compared with domestic standards and foreign standards for a more comprehensive and detailed. .</ P>.
Labels:
[:]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment